Guide
How often you should actually check that your backups work
A backup that has never been tested is a hope, not a backup, and the gap between the two is usually only discovered at the worst possible moment.
Existing is not the same as working
A backup file can exist, take up the expected amount of space, and still be unreadable or incomplete due to a corrupted copy, an interrupted process, or a setting that quietly changed. Only opening it confirms it actually works.
A simple test takes a few minutes
Periodically opening a single random file from a backup, rather than restoring everything, is usually enough to catch most serious problems without turning verification into a chore.
Pick a schedule you will actually keep
A quarterly or twice-yearly check that actually happens is far more useful than an ambitious monthly check that gets skipped after the first try. Consistency matters more than frequency here.
Questions people ask
What is the minimum I should check in a backup test?
Confirming that at least one recent file opens correctly from the backup is a reasonable minimum bar.
Should I test every single file in a backup?
Not necessary for routine checks — spot-checking a few files, with a fuller check occasionally, balances thoroughness against effort.